Broken access control
The user-A-reads-user-B’s-data bug: row-level security left off, missing authorization checks, and client-side auth anyone can skip.
Built with Lovable, Bolt, Cursor, Replit or Claude Code and now it breaks where it counts? We read the code the model never did, close the security and data holes, add tests, and hand back a version safe for real users.
Fixed scope · Senior engineers · No rewrite for the sake of itThe demo works — and that is exactly the trap. Failures show up where a demo never looks: authorization, data access, payments, and the unhappy paths.
The user-A-reads-user-B’s-data bug: row-level security left off, missing authorization checks, and client-side auth anyone can skip.
API keys committed to the repo, staging and production sharing one database, and logs leaking tokens and personal data.
Webhook handling, refunds and subscription state that look right in a demo — and quietly drop money in production.
We always start with an audit, not a rewrite. After it you know exactly what has to be fixed — and what can stay.
A mapped architecture review, findings ranked by severity, and a clear recommendation. Usually a few days, and useful on its own.
We close security holes, fix payments, add regression tests, and establish CI and observability. You get a version safe for real users.
Six steps, in this order. Critical security fixes ship first.
We read the code, map the architecture, and scan for security, data and scaling gaps.
We rank findings by severity and give an honest keep-versus-rebuild call.
We close broken access control, leaking secrets, payments and unhappy paths.
A regression suite that stops the next AI edit from breaking things silently.
CI, observability and rollbacks, so failures surface early.
Runbooks and a walkthrough — it is your code, and you operate it.
The production-readiness checklist we work through on every project.
Let’s talk. A free initial consultation where we learn your needs and see how technology can serve you.